(Also, I'm procrastinating.)
Turning Point? <--- This is an article by Chomsky, examining recent US statements about Israel and Palestine. Something interesting appears to be going on, from a casual perspective, as both Obama and Clinton keep emphasising this, "No, you cannot has more lands!" stand-point, despite Netanyahu consistently refusing those terms. America actually putting limits on Israel? It cannot be!
Now, the article is actually a lot less optimistic about it than I am - yes, I do think the US could be doing a lot more, and they're trying too hard not to upset Netanyahu, and most of the talk is just posturing. But I firmly believe that posturing is
important. Posturing is step one. Clinton today in direct public talks with the Israeli foreign minister reiterated the need for a halt to settlements. That's
big. That's the start of attitude change within the American political system, and yeah, I think that's the beginning of hope. Just like Obama has been a pretty huge disappointment so far, but I'm still pleased he got voted in, because even if his platform of change was a lie, at least it shows the public genuinely want change. It's a first step.
Now, it's a long article, people have lives, people don't care. So I'm going to copy a couple of bits focussing less on the details of the politics and more on the current treatment of Palestinians. Because people should know.
"The plans being executed right now are designed to leave Israel in control of the most valuable land in the West Bank, with Palestinians confined to unviable fragments, all separated from Jerusalem, the traditional center of Palestinian life. The "separation wall" also establishes Israeli control of the West Bank aquifer.
Hence Israel will be able to continue to ensure that Palestinians receive one-fourth as much water as Israelis, as the World Bank reported in April, in some cases below minimum recommended levels. In the other part of Palestine, Gaza, regular Israeli bombardment and the cruel siege reduce consumption far below. "
""On its coastal littoral, Gaza's limitations are marked by a different fence where the bars are Israeli gunboats with their huge wakes, scurrying beyond the Palestinian fishing boats and preventing them from going outside a zone imposed by the warships."" [Why?] "These Israeli naval attacks began shortly after the discovery by the British Gas group of what appear to be quite sizeable natural gas fields in Gaza's territorial waters. Industry journals report that Israel is already appropriating these Gazan resources for its own use, part of its commitment to shift its economy to natural gas."
"In Gaza today, there is no private sector to speak of and no industry. 80 percent of Gaza's agricultural crops were destroyed and Israel continues to snipe at farmers attempting to plant and tend fields near the well-fenced and patrolled border. Most productive activity has been extinguished...
Today, 96 percent of Gaza's population of 1.4 million is dependent on humanitarian aid for basic needs. According to the World Food Programme, the Gaza Strip requires a minimum of 400 trucks of food every day just to meet the basic nutritional needs of the population. Yet, despite a 22 March decision by the Israeli cabinet to lift all restrictions on foodstuffs entering Gaza,
only 653 trucks of food and other supplies were allowed entry during the week of May 10, at best meeting 23 percent of required need.. Israel now allows only 30 to 40 commercial items to enter Gaza compared to 4,000 approved products prior to June 2006." (Harvard Crimson, June 2, 2009)."
And finally just a general point from me about Israel's repetition of a need for "natural growth." Countries don't get to just go, "hey, we have a few too many people, mind if we shift our borders into your territory a bit?" Nevermind that every international body agrees that a huge amount of the settlements, particularly those in Jerusalem, are entirely illegal. You aren't allowed to go, "We need more space; we're taking some of yours." *Will not make an amazingly tasteless historical reference, however much I want to*.
EXAM TIME.